Deep-Bite Correction with Aligners – Mechanics & Limits (2025 Guide)
Fix deep-bite with aligners: intrusion, posterior extrusion, composite ramps & elastics. 2025 limits, success data & failure checklist.
Table of Contents
- Why deep-bite is tough for aligners
- Diagnosis & case selection (exceed vs treatable)
- Three biomechanics pillars – incisor intrusion, posterior extrusion, torque control
- Force delivery tools – attachments, bite-ramps, elastics, HFV
- Success benchmarks & relapse data (2019-24 meta)
- Protocols by overbite depth (≤4 mm, 4–6 mm, >6 mm)
- Red-flag checklist – when to switch to braces
- FAQ
- Conclusion & downloadable 10-point chair-side card
(≈ 2 500 words, 2 minutes read time.)
1 | Why deep-bite challenges aligners
Plastic wants to extrude anteriors; 1 mm intrusion loses 35 % programmed force by Day 3. Yet aligner-only correction is possible if overbite ≤ 5 mm and root morphology allows intrusion.
2 | Diagnosis & case selection
| Metric | Aligners OK | Needs combo / braces |
|---|---|---|
| Overbite | ≤ 6 mm | > 6 mm |
| Curve of Spee | ≤ 3 mm | > 3 mm |
| Lower incisor to APo | ≤ 2 mm | > 2 mm protrusion |
| Growth pattern | Low / normal angle | High angle (FMA ≥ 32°) |
—
3 | Three biomechanics pillars
- Incisor intrusion – dual vertical attachments + gingival power-ridge ↓ coronal bowing.
- Posterior extrusion – bonded button + vertical elastics 3 oz at night.
- Torque control – palatal bite-ramps 1 mm tall prevent lingual tipping.
4 | Force delivery tools (2025 update)
| Tool | Force | Compliance | Best use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vertical rectangular attachment | 25 g/intrusion | Medium | Upper incisors |
| Lingual bite-ramp (printed) | Intrusion + disclude | High | Severe overbite |
| Posterior extrusion elastic 3 oz | 200 g | Medium | Bilateral molar open |
| HFV 60 Hz 5 min/d | Seat, pain ↓33 % | High | Days 1-3 per tray |
5 | Success benchmarks
| Outcome | ≤ 4 mm group | 4–6 mm group |
|---|---|---|
| Mean intrusion achieved | 1.9 mm | 2.7 mm |
| Overbite reduction | 3.1 mm | 4.4 mm |
| Refinement sets | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Relapse @ 2 yr | 0.5 mm | 1.1 mm |
Meta-analysis 2024 (n = 782) shows 94 % success if planned overbite ≤ 4 mm and attachments ≥2 mm tall.
6 | Protocols by depth
Mild (≤ 4 mm)
- Vertical attachments U2-U2, L3-L3
- Bite-ramps printed; 7-day tray change
- HFV first 3 days
Moderate (4–6 mm)
- Add posterior elastics 5 oz nights
- Wear 10 days per tray
- Review CBCT root length before >2 mm intrusion
Severe (> 6 mm)
- Recommend hybrid: 6 mo braces with bite-turbo, finish in aligners.
- If patient refuses, disclose 50 % refinement risk.
7 | Red-flag checklist
❌ Incisor roots < 8 mm on pano (risk resorption)
❌ Gingival display > 5 mm (need VME surgery)
❌ Overjet < 1 mm (risk reverse deep-bite)
❌ Posterior open bite after 6 trays → add extrusion or slow change.
8 | FAQ
Can fem (force eruption modules) replace elastics?
Pilot 2024 shows similar extrusion if used 5 h/night.
Does HFV speed intrusion?
No direct; improves seat + comfort.
How long retainers?
Lifetime night wear; first 12 mo full-cover retainer with anterior cut-out.
9 | Conclusion & chair-side card
Deep-bite ≤ 6 mm can be predictably corrected with aligners using vertical attachments + bite-ramps + posterior extrusion elastics. Download our 10-point card for clinical team.
Disclaimer
This article has been compiled and presented by Dentovex Orthodontics – Research Group for educational purposes only. It is not intended as medical advice and should not replace a face-to-face consultation with a licensed dentist, orthodontist, or other qualified healthcare professional. Always seek the advice of your own clinician regarding any questions or concerns about diagnosis, treatment, or health conditions.
No responses yet